how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Post by **Hasan Cemal** » 09 Jun 2010, 05:54

I am pretty sure a lot of you heard about this riddle/tongue-twister in your childhood and we still hear about it like everyday.

Here are the answers to this ultra-weird question:

# He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

# A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

# If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

# But it definitely couldn't chuck Chuck Norris.(Chuck Norris WIKI)

# Since it is the same animal as the Groundhog, should we not instead ask : how much ground would a groundhog hog if a groundhog would hog ground?

# During my study of Woodchuck I came to the conclusion that woodchucks don't chuck wood but only drink beer. However, this beer can frequently motivate them towards actions that can closely resemble the chucking of wood.

And this is how AGAIN Chuck Norris got involved in it: A woodchuck would only chuck as much would as Chuck Norris would allow it to, because the woodchuck shares Chuck's name. Therefore, Chuck must punish it and make it chuck as much wood as Chuck can. So, a woodchuck would chuck as much wood as Chuck could.

Post by **Thebindle** » 09 Jun 2010, 07:56

over 9000?!

Post by **Hasan Cemal** » 09 Jun 2010, 15:41

Thebindle,(time=1276066570) wrote:over 9000?!

might be.

Post by **HAR** » 11 Jun 2010, 07:49

Dragonwood.

/Topic.

Post by **The Faith** » 11 Jun 2010, 08:48

H A Richards,(time=1276238964) wrote:Dragonwood.

/Topic.

Woodchuck would chuck Dragonwood in a minute

Post by **HAR** » 11 Jun 2010, 09:46

Assuming that the wood chuck would chuck wood (also amusing the wood chuck could chuck wood) the wood chuck would chuck the Dragonwood quickly. Suggesting that Dragonwood has a finite amount of wood that a wood chuck would chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood would mean that once the wood chuck has chucked all the wood in Dragonwood the wood chuck would have no more wood to chuck.

I don't see your logic Imso.

Post by **Hasan Cemal** » 11 Jun 2010, 13:23

H A Richards,(time=1276246012) wrote:Assuming that the wood chuck would chuck wood (also amusing the wood chuck could chuck wood) the wood chuck would chuck the Dragonwood quickly. Suggesting that Dragonwood has a finite amount of wood that a wood chuck would chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood would mean that once the wood chuck has chucked all the wood in Dragonwood the wood chuck would have no more wood to chuck.

That was just epic

Post by **Vettel F1** » 15 Jun 2010, 19:08

Norris = Latin for nothing?!

Post by **Hasan Cemal** » 16 Jun 2010, 06:56

I like Norris, he got some fun facts.

Post by **Tribuzi7** » 16 Jun 2010, 10:19

over 100000